Which of the following is the most likely consequence of divided government?

• A. Reorganization of the federal bureaucracy
• B. Conflicts between states
• C. Delays in confirmation of federal court nominees
• D. Conflicts between national government and states

Answer: (C)

The most likely consequence of a divided government is delays in the confirmation of federal court nominees. A divided government occurs when different political parties control different branches of government, such as when one party holds the presidency while another controls one or both chambers of Congress. In this scenario, the party in power may face significant opposition from the other party when attempting to confirm judicial appointments.

This opposition can lead to prolonged debates, increased scrutiny, and ultimately delays in the confirmation process. The need for a supermajority in the Senate to overcome filibusters further complicates this, as it often requires negotiating with the minority party, which can add additional time to the confirmation timeline.

While other options may touch on relevant issues, such as the possibility of conflicts between states or reorganization of federal agencies, these are less direct consequences of a divided government compared to the significant impact it has on the judicial confirmation process.